Personal Wealth Management / Politics

Germany’s Election Results in Gridlock

Falling political uncertainty is good for German stocks, in our view.

Editors’ note: MarketMinder Europe is nonpartisan, favouring no party nor any politician. We review political developments’ solely to assess potential market and/or economic effects.

After months of buildup, Sunday’s German federal elections offered little surprise, in our view. New Chancellor-in-waiting Friedrich Merz’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU)—and its Bavarian sister-party, the Christian Social Union (CSU)—are set to return to government for the first time since former Chancellor Angela Merkel stepped down in 2021.[i] Some lingering questions remain. Namely, lacking a majority, with whom will the CDU/CSU govern? But with the results in, we see political uncertainty fading, letting markets move on.

Results mostly matched polls.[ii] The CDU/CSU’s 28.5% vote share took the plurality and thus translates into the most seats in the Bundestag, though somewhat disproportionately.[iii] Whilst this puts the CDU/CSU in pole position to form a new government, they need at least one coalition partner to breach 50% of the seats and rule.[iv] What configurations are possible? Exhibit 1 shows parties’ vote share and the parliamentary seats of the now 630 (down from 735) they won.[v]

Exhibit 1: How Germany’s Vote Shook Out

Source: Bundeswahlleiterin.de, as of 23/2/2025.

Although the second-biggest vote getter was the Alternative for Germany (AfD), given its far-right reputation, all non-AfD parties vowed not to partner with it before the election.[vi] Next were the incumbent coalition partners Social Democratic Party (SPD) and Greens, then the Left Party, the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW), Free Democratic Party (FDP) and Stefan Seidler (SSW).

Notably, the upstart BSW and erstwhile SPD-Green coalition partner FDP fell below the 5% threshold for parliamentary entry (the second time the FDP’s participation in a coalition government destroyed its support, according to our reviews of past German elections).[vii] This was one of the biggest issues we saw heading into the election: How much support would they draw away from larger parties? Now we know they will garner no Bundestag seats—which boosts remaining parliamentary parties’ allocations. SSW—a Danish and Frisian party—isn’t subject to the vote threshold.[viii]

Still, the CDU/CSU’s options appear limited. Their most likely (and mathematically easiest) candidate to partner with: outgoing Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s SPD, which would give the prospective coalition 328 seats, a 13-seat majority. Markets are so familiar with a CDU/CSU-SPD configuration it has a nickname: the “Grand Coalition.”[ix] Indeed, Merkel presided over such a government in three of her four terms when the CDU/CSU dominated Germany’s electoral politics from 2005 – 2021.[x] Whilst it isn’t a given they will renew their partnership this time, most commentators we follow see it as a foregone conclusion.

A two-party coalition would probably be slightly less unwieldy than the three-party coalition that broke up in November—leading to Sunday’s snap vote—but we think gridlock is still likely. Although we think it is usually easier for two parties to negotiate than three, given their policy differences, it could still take time to hammer out an agreement. For example, the CDU/CSU wants to cut taxes, remove red tape and raise defence spending, but the SPD favours tax hikes, higher minimum wages and strengthening the pension system.[xi]

But what all these plans do have in common: They would likely require more net spending. Hence, headlines’ focus on Germany’s so-called “debt brake,” the constitutionally enshrined 2009 rule restricting the federal government’s net borrowing to 0.35% of GDP.[xii] Financial publications we read frequently blamed it for limiting public investment and, therefore, Germany’s current economic plight. (We disagree, more of which momentarily.)

Getting around the debt brake would take another constitutional change—requiring a two-thirds supermajority (420 Bundestag votes), which the Grand Coalition would lack even if it could muster support from the Greens.[xiii] That raises the question of whether the AfD or the Left Party might support the motion as well. Although possible, both seem leery. The AfD opposes increased defence spending (aimed at countering Russian aggression).[xiv] So does the Left, but for different reasons.[xv] It is no fan of the debt brake, so though theoretically amenable, it would like to see funds raised for social programmes rather than military enhancements or tax cuts. Whilst concessions are possible, amending the debt brake remains a tall order, in our view.

That said, we don’t think Germany’s markets need a big fiscal boost—and gridlock’s preventing one isn’t a headwind, in our view. We find all stocks need to do well is for reality to exceed prevailing sentiment. With the economy shrinking slightly each of the past two years—and forecasters we follow projecting a perma-slump (especially without government action)—even meagre growth or less contraction than anticipated could provide upside surprise.[xvi] Moreover, under the bonnet, household consumption—German GDP’s biggest component—is chugging along better than analysts we read appreciate, whilst global manufacturing is showing signs of firming.[xvii] Besides, many German firms generate significant revenue outside the country, making non-German economic conditions a critical consideration.[xviii]

That doesn’t mean the economy is set to fire on all cylinders, but we don’t think gangbusters growth—or a fiscal push to induce such—is necessary. Consider: German markets were fine last year without either, rising 17.6% and 12.2% in euros and pounds, respectively.[xix] Stagnant GDP isn’t great, but it isn’t the recession (deep and/or prolonged economic contraction) many economists we followed warned about. Government gridlock may be frustrating, but we find it prevents radical reform—lowering uncertainty—and promotes stable and predictable business conditions. Also, public investment isn’t auto-positive, as recent investments in clean energy that aren’t paying off illustrate.[xx] Misallocated fiscal spending risks having investors chase it into unproductive/unprofitable ventures, which can create missed opportunities elsewhere. Always remember: Government spending, legislation and regulation very often pick winners and losers that may be suboptimal.

With sentiment so sour, we think less bad is likely good enough for stocks. And with politics functionally little different from before, in our view—likely CDU/CSU-SPD gridlock instead of the SPD-Green flavour—German stocks don’t seem to mind. The MSCI Germany Index hit record highs in euros and pounds last week ahead of elections and is up 12.6% and 13.0% year to date, respectively in each currency, beating the MSCI World Index.[xxi] As political uncertainty recedes further and growth proves better than perceived, we think German outperformance likely continues.

 


[i] “YouGov Was the Most Accurate Pollster of the 2025 German Federal Election,” Frieder Schmid and Patrick English, YouGov, 24/2/2025.

[ii] Ibid.

[iii] “Explained: How Does Germany’s Electoral System Work and What Changes This Year?” Mared Gwyn Jones, Euronews, 23/2/2025.

[iv] Statement based on MarketMinder Europe’s calculations.

[v] See note iii.

[vi] Ibid.

[vii] “The Man Who Broke Germany’s Government Wants a Chance to Fix It,” Jim Tankersley and Tatiana Firsova, The New York Times, 21/5/2025. Accessed via the Internet Archive.

[viii] “A Quick Guide to German Elections,” Staff, Deutsche Welle, 18/2/2025.

[ix] “Germany’s ‘Grand Coalition’ Takes Shape: What It Means for the Economy,” Piero Cingari, Euronews, 24/2/2025.

[x] “Merz Needs Forced Marriage With SPD to Seal German Coalition,” Michael Nienaber, Arne Delfs and Kamil Kowalcze, Bloomberg, 24/2/2025. Accessed via Yahoo!

[xi] “German Election 2025: What’s in the Party Programs?” Jens Thurau, Deutsche Welle, 7/2/2025.

[xii] Ibid.

[xiii] “German Election: Merz’s CDU/CSU Strives to Build Coalition,” Staff, Deutsche Welle, 24/2/2025.

[xiv] “Germany’s AFD, Left Win Enough Seats to Block Changes to Debt Brake,” Maria Martinez and Christian Kraemer, Reuters, 24/2/2025. Accessed via MSN.

[xv] Ibid.

[xvi] Source: FactSet, as of 26/2/2025. Statement based on German GDP, 2023 – 2024.

[xvii] Source: FactSet and S&P Global, as of 26/2/2025. Statement based on German household consumption, Q3 2024 – Q4 2024, and global manufacturing purchasing managers’ index, February 2025.

[xviii] Source: FactSet, as of 26/2/2025. Statement based on the MSCI Germany Index’s revenue exposure by country.

[xix] Source: FactSet, as of 26/2/2025. MSCI Germany returns with net dividends, 31/12/2023 – 31/12/2024.

[xx] Source: FactSet, as of 26/2/2025. Statement based on the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, 31/12/2020 – 25/2/2025.

[xxi] Source: FactSet, as of 26/2/2025. MSCI Germany and World returns with net dividends, 31/11/2024 – 25/2/2025.

Get a weekly roundup of our market insights.

Sign up for our weekly e-mail newsletter.

By submitting, I understand Fisher Investments UK will use my personal information (i.e. first name, last name, and email) to contact me. Read more in our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. I can opt-out of communication at any time.

The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income Guide

See Our Investment Guides

The world of investing can seem like a giant maze. Fisher Investments UK has developed several informational and educational guides tackling a variety of investing topics.


Contact Us

Learn why 170,000 clients* trust Fisher Investments and its affiliates to manage their money and may be able to help you achieve your financial goals.

*As of 31/12/2024

New to Fisher? Call Us.

0800 144 4731

Contact Us Today